CONTACT

Examination Contingency Plan Policy

Examination Contingency Plan Policy

  1. Statement
  2. Aims
  3. Related policies and guidance
  4. Procedure: disruptions and mitigation


Appendix A: Key staff for contingency planning

1. Statement
Ashbourne puts in place strict measures that comply with JCQ regulations in order to ensure that all aspects of the examination administration are covered and that the examination series runs as smoothly as possible.

2. Aims
This plan examines potential risks and issues that could cause disruption to the examination process. By outlining actions and procedures to be invoked in case of disruption it is intended to mitigate the impact these disruptions may have on the examination process. This will allow members of the senior leadership team to act immediately in the event of an emergency or staff absence.

(Back to menu)

3. Related policies and guidance
3.1 Related policies

3.2 Guidance

  • JCQ, Preparing for disruption to examinations
  • Ofqual, Exam system contingency plan: England, Wales and Northern Ireland, What schools, colleges and other centres should do if exams or other assessments are seriously disrupted

(Back to menu)

4. Procedure: possible causes of disruption to the examination process and mitigation action
4.1 Examination officer extended absence at key points in the examination process (cycle)

Criteria for implementation of the plan
Key tasks required in the management and administration of the exam cycle not undertaken including:

Planning

  • annual data collection exercise not undertaken to collate information on qualifications and awarding body specifications being delivered;
  • annual exams plan not produced identifying essential key tasks, key dates and deadlines sufficient invigilators not recruited.

Entries

  • awarding bodies not being informed of early/estimated entries which prompts release of early information required by teaching staff;
  • candidates not being entered with awarding bodies for external exams/assessment;
  • awarding body entry deadlines missed or late or other penalty fees being incurred.

Pre-exams

  • invigilators not trained or updated on changes to instructions for conducting exams;
  • exam timetabling, rooming allocation; and invigilation schedules not prepared;
  • candidates not briefed on exam timetables and awarding body information for candidates;
  • confidential exam/assessment materials and candidates’ work not stored under required secure conditions;
  • internal assessment marks and samples of candidates’ work not submitted to awarding bodies/external moderators.

Exam time

  • exams/assessments not taken under the conditions prescribed by awarding bodies;
  • required reports/requests not submitted to awarding bodies during exam/assessment periods, for example very late arrival, suspected malpractice, special consideration;
  • candidates’ scripts not dispatched as required for marking to awarding bodies.

Results and post-results

  • access to examination results affecting the distribution of results to candidates;
  • the facilitation of the post-results services.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The senior line manager will be responsible, in the short term, to manage examinations.
  2. The senior line manager will appoint a suitable Deputy Examinations Officer as rapidly as possible, who will follow procedures and practices within the Examinations Officer remit.

4.2 SENDCo extended absence at key points in the examination cycle

Criteria for implementation of the plan
Key tasks required in the management and administration of the access arrangements process within the exam cycle not undertaken including:

Planning

  • candidates not tested/assessed to identify potential access arrangement requirement;
  • centre fails to recognise its duties towards disabled candidates as defined under the terms of the Equality Act 2010;
  • evidence of need and evidence to support normal way of working not collated.

Pre-exams

  • approval for access arrangements not applied for to the awarding body;
  • centre-delegated arrangements not put in place;
  • modified paper requirements not identified in a timely manner to enable ordering to meet external deadline;
  • staff (facilitators) providing support to access arrangement candidates not allocated and trained.

Exam time

  • access arrangement candidate support not arranged for exam rooms.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The Principal will be responsible, in the short term, to manage examinations.
  2. The Principal will appoint a suitable Deputy SENDCo as rapidly as possible, who will follow procedures and practices within the SENDCo remit.

4.3 Teaching staff extended absence at key points in the examination cycle

Criteria for implementation of the plan
Key tasks not undertaken including:

  • Early/estimated entry information not provided to the exams officer on time; resulting in pre-release information not being received;
  • Final entry information not provided to the exams officer on time; resulting in candidates not being entered for exams/assessments or being entered late/late or other penalty fees being charged by awarding bodies;
  • Non-examination assessment tasks not set/issued/taken by candidates as scheduled;
  • Candidates not being informed of centre assessed marks before marks are submitted to the awarding body and therefore not being able to consider appealing internal assessment decisions and requesting a review of the centre’s marking;
  • Internal assessment marks and candidates’ work not provided to meet awarding body submission deadlines.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The Principal will work with the Head of Faculty and Director of Studies to hire a new teacher.

(Back to menu)

4.4 Invigilation – lack of appropriately trained invigilators or invigilator absence

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Failure to recruit and train sufficient invigilators to conduct exams;
  • Invigilator shortage on peak exam days;
  • Invigilator absence on the day of an exam.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The Examinations Officer will work with their senior line manager to identify other members of staff that could invigilate.
  2. The Examination Officer will work with their senior line manager to identify suitable individuals through supply agencies.

4.5 Examination rooms – lack of appropriate rooms or main venues unavailable at short notice

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Exams officer unable to identify sufficient/appropriate rooms during exams timetable planning;
  • Insufficient rooms available on peak exam days;
  • Main exam venues unavailable due to an unexpected incident at exam time.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. Ashbourne College is the designated alternative venue for examinations in the event of an emergency. The Examinations Officer will work with their senior line manager to appoint additional invigilators, where required, and make other appropriate arrangements.

(Back to menu)

4.6 Failure of IT systems, including possibly cyber-attack

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • College IT and communications failure at final entry deadline;
  • College IT and communications failure during exams preparation;
  • College IT and communications failure at results release time;
  • Cyber-attack at any point during the examination series.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The Examinations Officer will work with the Facilities Team to ensure that suitable back-up plans are in place.
  2. In the event of a cyber-attack the JCQ will be informed immediately, as will other relevant authorities, parents and students.

(Back to menu)

4.7 Disruption of teaching time – centre closed for an extended period

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Centre closed or candidates are unable to attend for an extended period during normal teaching or study supported time, interrupting the provision of normal teaching and learning.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The College is able to offer Online Distance Learning as an alternative to face-to-face learning.

4.8 Candidates unable to take examinations because of a crisis – centre remains open

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Candidates are unable to attend the examination centre to take examinations as normal.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The College will communicate with the relevant awarding organisations at the outset to make them aware of the issue. The College will communicate with parents, carers and candidates regarding solutions to the issue.
  2. The College to liaise with examination boards to sit exams at a different venue.
  3. Apply for Special Consideration for those affected to the appropriate examination board.


4.9 Centre unable to open as normal during the exams period (including in the event of the centre being unavailable for examinations owing to an unforeseen emergency)

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Centre unable to open as normal during the exams period (including in the event of the centre being unavailable for examinations owing to an unforeseen emergency).

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The College will communicate with the relevant awarding organisations at the outset to make them aware of the issue. The College will communicate with parents, carers and candidates regarding solutions to the issue.
  2. The College to liaise with examination boards to relocate exams to a different venue.
  3. Apply for Special Consideration for those affected to the appropriate examination board.

(Back to menu)

4.10 Disruption in the distribution of examination papers

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Disruption to the distribution of examination papers to the centre in advance of examinations.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The College to communicate with awarding organisations to organise alternative delivery of papers.
  2. Arrange with exam boards for alternative means of receiving papers either electronically or by courier.
  3. The Examination Officer to ensure that papers are kept securely until needed.

4.11 Disruption to the transportation of completed examination scripts

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • The College to communicate with awarding organisations to organise alternative delivery of papers;
  • Arrange with exam boards for alternative means of receiving papers either electronically or by courier;
  • The Examination Officer to ensure that papers are kept securely until needed.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The College will communicate with awarding organisations immediately to resolve the issue.
  2. Alternative transport should only be used with the agreement of the relevant examination boards.
  3. Scripts must be stored securely until such time that the transport is confirmed.

4.12 Assessment evidence is not available to be marked

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Large scale damage to or destruction of completed examination scripts/assessment evidence before it can be marked.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The Head of Centre will communicate this immediately to the relevant awarding organisation(s) and subsequently to students and their parents and carers.
  2. The College will consider how we can document evidence throughout the academic year (e.g. taking photographs of artwork and storing the images in a secure online folder).

(Back to menu)

4.13 Centre unable to distribute results as normal (including in the event of the centre being unavailable on results day owing to an unforeseen emergency)

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Centre is unable to access or manage the distribution of results to candidates, or to facilitate post-results services.

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption

  1. The results will be sent electronically – there is no need for physical copies.

4.14 Severe disruption/evacuation during external examinations

Criteria for implementation of the plan

  • Unreasonable noise disruption
  • Fire/Bomb/Flood Alert during an examination

Centre actions to mitigate the impact of the disruption
Please consult the Severe Disruption/Evacuation during External Examinations Policy.

(Back to menu)

Authorised by The Principal
Date September 2023
Effective date of the policy September 2023
Circulation Teaching staff / all staff / parents / students on request
Review date September 2024

 

Appendix A: Key staff involved in contingency planning

Head of centre: Mike Kirby (Principal)
Examinations officers (EO): Lee Kirby
Senior line manager to EO: Mike Kirby
Facilities Manager: Fabio Carpene

Menu ☰